UPSB v4

Advanced Tricks / [HELP] FL IA/MA/RA

  1. Dakrowl
    Date: Sun, Feb 19 2012 12:31:25

    Tut on fingerless index around/ mid around/ ring around pls. Like: [video=youtube;wMBWBhaBwNA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMBWBhaBwNA[/video] 0.07 - 0.08 and [video=youtube;JXCMmyyeDKM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXCMmyyeDKM&feature=related[/video] 0.25 - 0.26 tut pls TYVM

  2. Soren
    Date: Sun, Feb 19 2012 15:21:52

    Can you do a twisted sonic bust? Because the bust part is a fingerless indexaround if i'm not mistaken.

  3. Elune
    Date: Sun, Feb 19 2012 15:53:22

    I belive these are variations of FL Fingerarounds ... 0:07 - 0:08 in HAL's vid was FL Indexaround vertical (bust as we know it is FL Indexaround [palmdown?])

  4. Ceru Seiyu
    Date: Sun, Feb 19 2012 16:08:22

    Bust is a Bak reverse.

  5. Karrot
    Date: Sun, Feb 19 2012 21:41:07

    Supergirl wrote: Can you do a twisted sonic bust? Because the bust part is a fingerless indexaround if i'm not mistaken.
    I thought you could do the bust not fingerless

  6. Dakrowl
    Date: Sun, Feb 19 2012 22:34:01

    yea i can do palm down bust but palm side fl ia is different from that i assume?

  7. Danny116
    Date: Sun, Feb 19 2012 23:55:29

    a bust is a FL bak rev FL IA is palmside like HAL's video needless to say much more difficult then busts IMO it works in a similar fashion to S777's inverse baks

  8. midniteferret
    Date: Mon, Feb 20 2012 04:37:42

    @Karrot Technically yes, but it is less "chunky" if you do it fingerless

  9. Dakrowl
    Date: Mon, Feb 20 2012 09:40:26

    Danny116 wrote: a bust is a FL bak rev FL IA is palmside like HAL's video needless to say much more difficult then busts IMO it works in a similar fashion to S777's inverse baks
    yes this is what im talking about, some help with palm side fl IA

  10. YUi
    Date: Mon, Feb 20 2012 10:21:09

    Crazy shit, i would also like to see someone making a tut :)

  11. Karrot
    Date: Mon, Feb 20 2012 16:49:02

    midniteferret wrote: @Karrot Technically yes, but it is less "chunky" if you do it fingerless
    So it looks smoother fingerless so it looks better