UPSB v4
Forum Games / Zendo #3 - GAME OVER
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:00:12
Rules are found in Zendo #1 [spoiler=Solution]A koan must contain at least 3 red-faced emotes[/spoiler] Koans which follow the Buddha-nature: :peace::boing::peace::antiboing::peace: :peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace: :peace::dunno::peace::dunno::peace: :peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace: :peace:-_-:peace:-_-:peace: :ignore::O:angryfire:-_-:peace: :ignore::bye::ignore::bye::ignore: :peace::happy::peace::happy::peace: :peace:-_-:banghead:-_-:peace: :peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace: (counter-example) :peace::S:peace::S:peace: :ignore::rofl::ignore::rofl::ignore: :ignore::'(:ignore::rofl::ignore: :ignore::'(:ignore::'(:ignore: :devildance::antiboing::devildance::antiboing::devildance: :peace::notlistening::peace::p:peace::snowman::peace::$$$::peace: Koans which do not follow the Buddha-nature: :excited::pointlaugh::xarrow::xarrow: -_--_-:boing::(:boing:-_--_- :boing::):boing::(:boing: :dunno: :dunno::boing::S:golfing::pickle: :antiboing::boing: :yo::spin::yo::spin::yo: :'(:boing::'(:antiboing::'( :pickle::dumbo::pickle::dumbo::pickle: :gloomy::boing::gloomy::antiboing::gloomy: :peace::antiboing::peace: :S:(:S:(:S :angryfire::ssst::angryfire::ssst: :devildance::excited: :S:peace::S :peace::pickle::peace: (counter-example)
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:00:56
-_--_-:boing::(:boing:-_--_- ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:01:50
strat1227 wrote: -_--_-:boing::(:boing:-_--_- ?
no buddha for you -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:02:08
:boing::):boing::(:boing: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:02:33
:dunno:
Zombo wrote: no buddha for you
:dunno::boing::S:golfing::pickle: ? -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:02:40
iColor wrote: :boing::):boing::(:boing: ?
no buddha-nature in this one -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:03:00
:antiboing::boing: :yo::spin::yo::spin::yo:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:03:03
strat1227 wrote: :dunno: :dunno::boing::S:golfing::pickle: ?
no buddha-nature in both -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:04:47
DrakeOhMeteor007 wrote: :antiboing::boing: :yo::spin::yo::spin::yo:
no buddha :( -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:04:48
:peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace: How about this, master?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:05:39
:'(:boing::'(:antiboing::'( ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:05:47
Erirornal Kraione wrote: :peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace: How about this, master?
yes that is correct! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:05:55
casual wrote: :'(:boing::'(:antiboing::'( ?
no, this won't do -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:06:10
:pickle::dumbo::pickle::dumbo::pickle: :peace::dunno::peace::dunno::peace:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:07:06
DrakeOhMeteor007 wrote: :pickle::dumbo::pickle::dumbo::pickle:
no, not good enough -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:07:19
:gloomy::boing::gloomy::antiboing::gloomy:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:08:03
:peace::dunno::peace::dunno::peace:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:08:17
:peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:08:22
:peace:-_-:peace:-_-:peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:08:53
DrakeOhMeteor007;159645]:peace::dunno::peace::dunno::peace:[/QUOTE] yes this is good! [QUOTE=Nachoaddict wrote: :gloomy::boing::gloomy::antiboing::gloomy:
no this is bad! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:09:21
strat1227;159649]:peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace: ?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=casual wrote: :peace:-_-:peace:-_-:peace: ?
both are buddha approved! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:09:37
:ignore::O:angryfire:-_-:peace: :ignore::bye::ignore::bye::ignore:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:10:26
:peace::happy::peace::happy::peace:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:10:59
:peace:-_-:banghead:-_-:peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:11:11
:peace::antiboing::peace:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:12:08
DrakeOhMeteor007;159653]:ignore::O:angryfire:-_-:peace: :ignore::bye::ignore::bye::ignore:[/QUOTE] yes to both [QUOTE=Nachoaddict;159654]:peace::happy::peace::happy::peace:[/QUOTE] yes [QUOTE=strat1227;159655]:peace:-_-:banghead:-_-:peace: ?[/QUOTE] yes [QUOTE=Erirornal Kraione wrote: :peace::antiboing::peace:
sadly this is not good -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:12:48
Must follow this colour pattern red yellow red yellow red
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:13:43
:S:(:S:(:S ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:13:44
:angryfire::ssst::angryfire::ssst:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:13:58
DrakeOhMeteor007 wrote: Must follow this colour pattern red yellow red yellow red
Unfortunately, you still have much to learn, my student. The following disprove your rule: :peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace: yet I am quite certain it is close to Buddha -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:14:30
:peace::S:peace::S:peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:14:40
:ignore::rofl::ignore::rofl::ignore: ? :ignore::'(:ignore::rofl::ignore: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:14:45
Zombo wrote: Unfortunately, you still have much to learn, my student. The following disprove your rule: :peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace: yet I am quite certain it is close to Buddha
how is green yellow? nvm D: -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:15:04
:devildance::excited: :ignore::'(:ignore::'(:ignore:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:16:39
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, why do i get teh rule on the 2nd guess D:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:17:28
strat1227;159661]:S:(:S:(:S ?[/QUOTE] this is wrong [QUOTE=Nachoaddict;159662]:angryfire::ssst::angryfire::ssst:[/QUOTE] this is wrong too! [QUOTE=casual;159664]:peace::S:peace::S:peace: ?[/QUOTE] this is correct! [QUOTE=strat1227;159665]:ignore::rofl::ignore::rofl::ignore: ? :ignore::'(:ignore::rofl::ignore: ?[/QUOTE] these are all correct! [QUOTE=DrakeOhMeteor007 wrote: how is green yellow?
I gave a counter-example. My example does not follow your rule, but it has the Buddha-nature. -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:18:54
:S:peace::S ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:19:14
Guess: Every other emote must be red, beginning and ending with a red one?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:19:32
Nachoaddict wrote: :devildance::excited: :ignore::'(:ignore::'(:ignore:
the first one does not follow the path to enlightenment the second does. -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:20:11
:devildance::antiboing::devildance::antiboing::devildance: :peace::notlistening::peace::p:peace::snowman::peace::$$$::peace:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:20:52
if a koan is buddha-like, it must be in the form: red * red * red, with a red emoticon at the beginning and end ( * denotes an emoticon which is not red)
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:21:05
strat1227 wrote: Guess: Every other emote must be red, beginning and ending with a red one?
Isuk you're a bit late lol, i posted that already -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:21:42
casual;159673]:S:peace::S ?[/QUOTE] this does not have the Buddha-nature [QUOTE=strat1227;159674]Guess: Every other emote must be red, beginning and ending with a red one?[/QUOTE] You must work harder, my pupil! Here is a counter-example :peace::pickle::peace: this follows your example, but does not have the buddha-nature! [QUOTE=Nachoaddict wrote: :devildance::antiboing::devildance::antiboing::devildance: :peace::notlistening::peace::p:peace::snowman::peace::$$$::peace:
both are correct! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:22:20
Lol fuck i left out a word D:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:22:58
:angryfire::dog::angryfire::sleep::angryfire::xd::angryfire::vcool::angryfire:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:24:36
i.suk wrote: if a koan is buddha-like, it must be in the form: red * red * red, with a red emoticon at the beginning and end ( * denotes an emoticon which is not red)
this is wrong! refer to previously submitted koan :peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace::antiboing::peace: does not follow your rule, but is buddha-like! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:24:56
Nachoaddict wrote: :angryfire::dog::angryfire::sleep::angryfire::xd::angryfire::vcool::angryfire:
this follows the laws of Buddha! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:26:33
:ignore::ignore::ignore::ignore::ignore:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:27:28
Nachoaddict wrote: :ignore::ignore::ignore::ignore::ignore:
this is good! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:28:55
:ignore::rofl::angryfire::teach::peace:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:29:50
Nachoaddict wrote: :ignore::rofl::angryfire::teach::peace:
this is good! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:31:52
The koan must start with and end with a red emote. Every other emote must be red (the emotes in between can be any color). The koan must include at least 5 total emotes.
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:33:51
Nachoaddict wrote: The koan must start with and end with a red emote. Every other emote must be red (the emotes in between can be any color). The koan must include at least 5 total emotes.
I'm sorry but this is wrong :pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace: is a valid koan which does not respect your rule. -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:34:34
:ZUMBO::mak::vcool::sfsr::zblader::ilulz: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:34:36
-_-:peace:-_-:peace:-_-:peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:35:38
MightAsWellGG;159691]:ZUMBO::mak::vcool::sfsr::zblader::ilulz: ?[/QUOTE] this is not even close to be correct lol! [QUOTE=casual wrote: -_-:peace:-_-:peace:-_-:peace: ?
this is fine! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:36:03
:pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle: ? :pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:36:53
strat1227 wrote: :pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle: ? :pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle: ?
the first is correct the second is not! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:37:32
:dunce::ignore::'(:ignore::rofl::ignore: :dumbo::ignore::guitar::ignore::welcome::ignore::hanged::ignore::dunce::ignore: :666::ignore::bye::ignore::rolleyes::ignore::ignore:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:37:57
:pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:37:58
Nachoaddict wrote: :dunce::ignore::'(:ignore::rofl::ignore: :dumbo::ignore::guitar::ignore::welcome::ignore::hanged::ignore::dunce::ignore: :666::ignore::bye::ignore::rolleyes::ignore::ignore:
all correct! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:38:45
strat1227 wrote: :pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle::peace::pickle: ?
KORREKT! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:39:25
:666::ignore::bye::ignore::rolleyes::ignore::ignore: is right??
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:40:00
:666::ignore::bye::ignore::ignore::ignore: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:40:02
MASSA, I PROPOSE A PROPHECY Odd number of red emotes, no red emote can be touching eachother, more than 1 red emote?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:40:09
strat1227 wrote: :666::ignore::bye::ignore::rolleyes::ignore::ignore: is right??
Buddah says "damnnnnnnnnnnnn right nigga!" -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:40:44
Rule: There must be at least 3 emotes which contain the colour red.
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:40:46
:ignore::ignore::ignore:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:41:14
MightAsWellGG wrote: MASSA, I PROPOSE A PROPHECY Odd number of red emotes, no red emote can be touching eachother, more than 1 red emote?
sadly this is wrong :peace::):peace: follows your rule, but it is not buddha-natured -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:42:13
what is :face: and is :ZUMBO::ignore::ZUMBO::ignore::ZUMBO::ignore: work ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:42:17
shoeman6 wrote: Rule: There must be at least 3 emotes which contain the colour red.
this is wrong here is a counter-example :mak::mak::mak: follows your rule but not the way of Buddha. -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:42:24
:peace:-_-:peace::peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:43:16
Zombo wrote: sadly this is wrong :peace::):peace: follows your rule, but it is not buddha-natured
not odd number of red emotes -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:43:57
Nachoaddict;159707]:ignore::ignore::ignore:[/QUOTE] correct [QUOTE=casual wrote: :peace:-_-:peace::peace: ?
correct @MightAsWellGG sorry, here is another counter-example :peace::peace::peace: this has buddha-nature, but does not follow your rule. -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:45:44
:peace::peace:-_-:peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:46:01
casual wrote: :peace::peace:-_-:peace: ?
thats fine -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:46:28
:party::party:^_^:pickle: :party::party::party: :pickle::pickle:^_^:pickle: :ZUMBO::ignore::ignore: :birthday::birthday::birthday: :birthday::xarrow::birthday:
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:46:58
:peace:-_-:peace::peace::peace: ?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:47:24
shoeman6 wrote: :party::party:^_^:pickle: :party::party::party: :pickle::pickle:^_^:pickle: :ZUMBO::ignore::ignore: :birthday::birthday::birthday: :birthday::xarrow::birthday:
all wrong! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:47:35
casual wrote: :peace:-_-:peace::peace::peace: ?
thats fine -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:49:14
:peace:-_-:peace::peace::peace::peace::peace: :peace:-_-:peace::peace:-_-:peace: :peace::peace:-_-?
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:49:23
when i said "Odd number of red emotes, no red emote can be touching eachother, more than 1 red emote?" i dont think i elaborated enough. A koan with an odd number amount of red emotes, and no red emote could follow directly after a red emote (ie :peace: :peace:) and that there is more than 1 red emote (so 3+)
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:49:35
Rule: There must be at least 3 emotes which are fully red. Frog~
-
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:50:00
MightAsWellGG wrote: when i said "Odd number of red emotes, no red emote can be touching eachother, more than 1 red emote?" i dont think i elaborated enough. A koan with an odd number amount of red emotes, and no red emote could follow directly after a red emote (ie :peace: :peace:) and that there is more than 1 red emote (so 3+)
2 red emotes can touch, look 2 posts above yours -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:50:47
casual;159721]:peace:-_-:peace::peace::peace::peace::peace: :peace:-_-:peace::peace:-_-:peace: :peace::peace:-_-?[/QUOTE] first two are correct the last one does not respect the laws of Buddha [QUOTE=MightAsWellGG wrote: when i said "Odd number of red emotes, no red emote can be touching eachother, more than 1 red emote?" i dont think i elaborated enough. A koan with an odd number amount of red emotes, and no red emote could follow directly after a red emote (ie :peace: :peace:) and that there is more than 1 red emote (so 3+)
:peace::peace::):peace: does not respect your rule, but it follows the buddha-nature -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:51:12
FrogPrinceXD wrote: Rule: There must be at least 3 emotes which are fully red. Frog~
Frog~, you are worthy to be my successor! -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:52:50
Zombo wrote: Frog~, you are worthy to be my successor!
Wtf that's bullshit lol, no emote is fully red ... :peace: is red white and black -
Date: Fri, Dec 16 2011 03:54:50
strat1227 wrote: Wtf that's bullshit lol, no emote is fully red ... :peace: is red white and black
well the real rule is red-faced, but it might be too hard