UPSB v4

Advanced Tricks / Inverse Tipped Sonic ?

  1. Elune
    Date: Sun, Jul 10 2011 05:08:32

    Well when I read HAL's WT1 combo I found Inverse Tipped Sonic ... How could this trick be performed (Well HAL's spinning seemed to hard for me to understand >.<) Can someone give me the performance of that single trick ? P/s : And also, Inverse Pass ?

  2. Riley
    Date: Sun, Jul 10 2011 05:55:49

    Idk inverse pass, I don't think it exists. But inverse tipped sonic is doing a tipped sonic, with the fingers going up, instead of down, when the pen goes out of their grip. Hopefully that description works for you.

  3. Soren
    Date: Wed, Aug 24 2011 15:52:17

    can i request a video of this trick from someone?

  4. Mike
    Date: Wed, Aug 24 2011 20:02:19

    Riley wrote: Idk inverse pass, I don't think it exists. But inverse tipped sonic is doing a tipped sonic, with the fingers going up, instead of down, when the pen goes out of their grip. Hopefully that description works for you.
    No, that's a Tipped Sonic Reverse.

  5. wotu1
    Date: Wed, Aug 24 2011 20:25:38

    Mike wrote: No, that's a Tipped Sonic Reverse.
    i think he means when your fingers stick up like what iota did at 1:13 [video=youtube;RM3brOqsj4Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM3brOqsj4Q[/video]

  6. Mike
    Date: Wed, Aug 24 2011 20:40:51

    I'm pretty sure that's still just a normal Tipped Sonic.

    wotu1 wrote: i think he means when your fingers stick up like what iota did at 1:13 [video=youtube;RM3brOqsj4Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM3brOqsj4Q[/video]

  7. Greenman
    Date: Wed, Aug 24 2011 21:38:04

    first trick he does in combo 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAjv_c_RK5s

  8. DArKT
    Date: Thu, Aug 25 2011 01:12:57

    Seem's pretty hard O.o

  9. JC
    Date: Thu, Aug 25 2011 17:56:18

    isn't inverse tipped sonic just like a tipped sonic...but isnted of your fingers tucked in,t hey're all out?

  10. shoeman6
    Date: Thu, Aug 25 2011 20:19:42

    Even if that's what it's referring to it's still improper use of the modifier and ends up causing needless confusion, as seen in this thread. Edit: it's correct, sorry.

  11. JC
    Date: Thu, Aug 25 2011 21:37:17

    shoeman6 wrote: Even if that's what it's referring to it's still improper use of the modifier and ends up causing needless confusion, as seen in this thread.
    Why is that an improper use of the modifier? There is a sonic and an inverse sonic...why can't there be a rotationless (tipped) sonic and also an inverse rotationless (tipped) sonic?

  12. shoeman6
    Date: Thu, Aug 25 2011 22:01:49

    mm... my mistake. Didn't read carefully enough. What Riley and JC said is correct.