UPSB v4
Off-topic / Reflexive Property
-
Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 21:44:52
[SIZE="3"]If [B]Shadow[/B] beat [B]Vicgotgame[/B] and [B]Vicgotcame[/B] beat [B]Eriror[/B] and [B]Eriror[/B] beat [B]Bonkura[/B], then isn't [B]Shadow[/B] better than [B]Bonkura[/B]?[/SIZE] [SIZE="1"]If [B]Boy 1[/B] loves [B]Girl 1[/B] and [B]Girl 1[/B] loves [B]Boy 2[/B] then doesn't [B]Boy 1[/B] love[B] Boy 2[/B]?[/SIZE] :?
-
Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 21:47:44
no cuz beating someone doesn't mean you're better then them and for the love thing, you should be able to figure out why its wrong yourself
-
Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 22:23:48
wtf is this part of a retarded test or something
-
Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 22:38:19
no because the transitive property does not apply to the relationship "beats" and "loves" this is not an example of reflexive property btw. its a syllogism
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 00:09:00
well, editing yours to make it true If Shadow [B]is better than[/B] Vicgotgame and Vicgotcame [B]is better than [/B]Eriror and Eriror [B]is better than[/B] Bonkura, then isn't Shadow better than Bonkura? then yes, definately, top of the food chain, in a way. If Boy 1 loves Girl 1 and Girl 1 loves Boy 2 then doesn't Boy 1 love Boy 2? definately no
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 01:11:12
well the thing is that arguably everyone in the WT currently is better than bonkura because he missed out on 4 years of the PS world... each situation is completely different. Eriror beat vicgotgame at one point, and vicgotgame beat eriror at another point, who is better or worse can't really be decided. This question is really just retarded but im not surprised seeing who it is coming from
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 01:13:06
Wonder wrote: well the thing is that arguably everyone in the WT currently is better than bonkura because he missed out on 4 years of the PS world... each situation is completely different. Eriror beat vicgotgame at one point, and vicgotgame beat eriror at another point, who is better or worse can't really be decided. This question is really just retarded but im not surprised seeing who it is coming from
Arguably Bonkura is still better than everyone in the World Tournament. -
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 01:20:32
maunierox wrote: Arguably Bonkura is still better than everyone in the World Tournament.
sure on a creative level you can say he's the best all around. But on a technical level and even aesthetics, bonkura at his peak obviously cant surmount today's best. Whether or not he would have been good today is another deal but for now thats how it is. -
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 01:23:16
Aaron Carter argues that he beat Shaq. Does that make it true?
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 01:29:08
ahahahahahaha
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:24:31
@Wonder Well, you could DEFINITELY argue about that, because Bonkura only spun about 2-3 years, and Vicgotgame spun for 5 years. There's an obvious difference if he spill spun today (RIP) he could be considerably better.
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 07:51:51
when did shadow beat vigotgame? *clueless*
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 08:06:43
i.suk wrote: when did shadow beat vigotgame? *clueless*
SoCal Gathering I think...? That live battle was the only battle they've ever had I think -
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 08:09:03
I'm guessing here. But claiming that one spinner is better than the other is not really a concrete claim, especially those who has only a battle against each other. And one spinner is 'better' than the other in maybe only in one aspect, such as creativity or linkages, and the latter spinner may be more dominant in another aspect. So claiming that Shadowserpant is 'better' than Vic is not a really good statement. Just a noob's opinion :) Ah, ninja'd by JC
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 18:23:11
Spartan wrote: @Wonder Well, you could DEFINITELY argue about that, because Bonkura only spun about 2-3 years, and Vicgotgame spun for 5 years. There's an obvious difference if he spill spun today (RIP) he could be considerably better.
Bonkura was spinning for 6 years before he passed away. -
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 20:08:31
You can't compare a spinner to another spinner like that, Jan. What makes you progress and win the battle is the combo, not the spinner. Eriror beat Bonkura because he had a better combo, Bonkura also had a big chance to beat Eriror as well if he had made a better combo. =/ See the proper connection now?
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 21:22:11
I always thought reflexive prop was x=x and transitive is if x>y and y>z then x>z
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 22:23:52
zweebna wrote: Aaron Carter argues that he beat Shaq. Does that make it true?
Fuck yeah, that song was the best. -
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 22:44:37
what nicetricks said. Jan, what you're describing is not the reflexive property, its closer to the transitive property. The reflexive property is that anything is equal/congruent to itself.
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 23:00:47
I love how Jan makes these threads and not come back to them. The first example is not an equality, so it is true in a number sense. 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1. However, these are spinners you are talking about, there are many factors changing the outcome. Who was judging, were they at their best, what mod was used, etc The second one is just stupid. In a number sense, your saying that boy 1 = girl 1 = boy 2. Go figure.
-
Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 23:03:37
a.sate, its not that lol... its that he used the wrong term for the property he was trying to describe xD
-
Date: Thu, Apr 14 2011 00:32:30
@Eriror Oh, thanks.