UPSB v4

Off-topic / 48÷2(9+3)

  1. hahakumquat
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 17:14:42

    2 or 288? Terrible notation, but what do you think should be right?

  2. Alvaris
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 17:18:09

    2?

  3. hahakumquat
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 17:29:06

    order of operations says it's 288. please defend answers

  4. Alvaris
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 17:37:39

    Nevermind..i'd say its 288 as well now, thought stuffs in brackets were done first >.>

  5. Quake
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 17:52:26

    use PEMDAS. that way u kno what order ur going in. Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, DIvide, Add, Subtract. in that order. therefore the answer would be 2.

  6. hahakumquat
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 18:11:00

    remember multiply and divide are on equal terms (as well as addition and subtraction) order of operations also says to work left to right

  7. Quake
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 18:18:49

    lol oops i guess ur right, :P

  8. Jamal
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 19:45:53

    first you do parenthesis 48÷2(12) division or multiplication from left to right, in this case division, the parenthesis are just throwing you guys off. 48÷2(12) is the same as: 48 ÷ 2 x 12 therefore, 24 x 12 = 288 not sure why all the confusion

  9. Zombo
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 19:58:02

    wow u use ÷ instead of /, ur not lazy

  10. Kastup
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 19:58:14

    Wonder wrote: not sure why all the confusion
    Yeah. Lol.

  11. Escorpio123
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 20:10:02

    It is obviously 288 :facepalm:

  12. Van
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 20:21:16

    Who the hell answered 2? Its 288 Hur durr

  13. TheAafg
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 21:47:04

    the answer is 288 as wonder said earlier. Something interesting my white friend told me; If you put 48÷2(9+3) in a calculator you get 2 and if you put 48/2(9+3) you get 288.

  14. Loanshark
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:16:48

    :blaugh:

  15. V-Storm
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:19:38

    It's 288. It's as if this: (48÷2)*(9+3) type this on google: 48/2(9+3)

  16. Zombo
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:27:54

    TheAafg wrote: the answer is 288 as wonder said earlier. Something interesting my [B]white friend [/B]told me; If you put 48÷2(9+3) in a calculator you get 2 and if you put 48/2(9+3) you get 288.
    why does it matter?

  17. nateiskewl
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:41:02

    Did you see this on reddit you fucking nerd?

  18. chris
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:41:05

    It's the sign used that confuses.

  19. Jamal
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:41:15

    Zombo wrote: why does it matter?
    lol i was wondering the same thing probably what the dealio is is that it might have been like you cant express a fraction correctly when typing. for example if you want 48 all over 2(9+3) then yes that would be 2. if you write it the way you wrote it right now, then it would be 288, it all depends on how it is expressed, so it may have caused confusion. In the case of computers, extra parentheses are required

  20. TheAafg
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:41:24

    Zombo wrote: why does it matter?
    asians don't require a calculator, and whites can't do shit without a calculator.

  21. Erirornal Kraione
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:47:34

    I'd like to point and laugh at you.

  22. chris
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 22:54:06

    Erirornal Kraione wrote: I'd like to point and laugh at you.
    :pointlaugh: there. :P

  23. Zombo
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 23:04:00

    in Canada, you have to answer a basic arithmetic question to collect any contest reward... imagine you just won Lotto 1 million and you have to answer 48/2(9+3) ollollololl

  24. Loanshark
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 23:16:01

    Zombo wrote: in Canada, you have to answer a basic arithmetic question to collect any contest reward...
    Wait, why? O_o

  25. Zombo
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 23:21:35

    Loanshark wrote: Wait, why? O_o
    its a loop hole in the canadian law if you dont have a "skill challenge", the contest is classified as gambling, so you need special license for that. if you have a "skill challenge", it is considered a competition and not gambling. basically its not ok to have a contest which is pure luck. you need to earn your money.

  26. tacohead12
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 23:26:54

    I think the solution is to have some more parentheses :P

  27. Awesome
    Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 23:31:40

    you ask the person who wrote it, all of you fail, if you can't find them the numbers junk on account of them being an idiot

  28. Van
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 00:45:41

    yo y are there so many ppl voting 2 okay 48/2(9+3) means 48/2 x 12 which becomes 24 x 12 = 288 if the equation was 48/[2(9+3)] it becomes 48/[2(12)], or 48/24, which is 2 unless theres that bracket u dont do the multiplication first hur durrrr

  29. hahakumquat
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 01:07:57

    nateiskewl wrote: Did you see this on reddit you fucking nerd?
    nope

  30. TheAafg
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 01:23:11

    48/2 (9+3) ---> brackets first 48/2 (12) or 48/2 x 12 ----> Division comes first in order of appearance hence the reason we divide first 24 x 12 = 288 /thread

  31. RicLu98
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 01:32:10

    it's 288. multiplication and division go together. whichever comes first is whatver to do first.

  32. TheAafg
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 01:45:22

    RicLu98 wrote: it's 2. multiplication and division go together. whichever comes first is whatver to do first.
    how exactly did multiplication come first in this situation ? :facepalm:

  33. AwonW
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 01:52:29

    Multiplication and division are the same operation guys. Parenthesis, then left to right.

  34. Hidekyo
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 01:53:31

    google it and its 288 (48÷2)(9+3)

  35. RicLu98
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 01:59:15

    oops i meant to write 288 not 2. you do the parantheses so you get 48/2(12) so then it's 48/2 which is 24 then times 12 which is 288.

  36. chris
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 02:30:30

    PEMDAS, muddabitchiz Also, 12 = 12/1 lol

  37. Mike
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 02:41:15

    Really?

  38. Colin
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 03:14:15

    48÷2(9+3) 48÷2(12) 48÷24 =2 am i wrong?

  39. AwonW
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 03:16:21

    Colin wrote: 48÷2(9+3) 48÷2(12) 48÷24 =2 am i wrong?
    Yup. Parenthesis go first, then division and multiplication are the same operation, so they operations go left to right. The answer is 288.

  40. YugLlort
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 03:43:55

    For all who voted 2, I'm losing hope for the human race.

  41. FusionX
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 03:45:17

    YugLlort wrote: For all who voted 2, I'm losing hope for the human race.
    ^this

  42. TheAafg
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 04:03:53

    I don't know if it is just me but I find it highly weird and unusual when you guys use "parenthesis" instead of brackets.

  43. hahakumquat
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 06:01:17

    that's because parentheses are () while brackets are [] but they serve the same purpose. i think some people learn bodmas? B-Brackets first O-Orders (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.) DM-Division and Multiplication (left-to-right) AS-Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right) so you might've learned the term brackets instead.

  44. tylt
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 06:28:54

    TheAafg wrote: I don't know if it is just me but I find it highly weird and unusual when you guys use "parenthesis" instead of brackets.
    I find it highly weird and unusual that you think that all white people need calculators to do math. Mad racist dog, not cool. We learn parenthesis in America, deal with that shit.

  45. davidguy
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 13:56:40

    this is actually spreading on the internet lol i was wonder why there was a thread for a random math equation

  46. Clyde
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 14:02:04

    pemdas 288

  47. MickChickenn
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 14:06:15

    not that hard of a question. simple math.

  48. Tialys
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 19:18:50

    The way the expression is written, I say 2!

  49. Van
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 19:35:17

    Difference between a parenthesis and a bracket is that there are brackets to indicate that you do that side first Like I said before, 48/[2(9+3)] Will mean first, do 9+3=12 then 2 x 12 = 24 then 48/24=2 But this equation doesn't have brackets, which means you just go left->right after the parenthesis

  50. Awesome
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 19:46:23

    Tialys wrote: The way the expression is written, I say 2!
    Didn't you take engineering and you wouldn't clear up any possible ambiguity before saying what was meant by that number? numbers are srs buisness!

  51. Zombo
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 21:33:24

    Tialys wrote: The way the expression is written, I say 2!
    wouah, respect.

  52. Tialys
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 22:11:43

    Awesome wrote: Didn't you take engineering and you wouldn't clear up any possible ambiguity before saying what was meant by that number? numbers are srs buisness!
    Ok! Taking 48÷2(9+3) to be equivalent to 48/2(9+3), the ambiguity comes from writing a fraction in a single line. Implied multiplication by proximity and explicit multiplication (using the multiplication sign) give the same result, but the former is considered a single term. Ex.: ab = a×b, but ab is deemed a single term. If you were to write 1/ab, people would assume it meant 1/(ab) and not (1/a)b [= b/a] So, in 48÷2(9+3), it's taken to mean 48/[2(9+3)] and not (48/2)×(9+3). If the original expression was written as 48÷2[B][COLOR="red"]×[/COLOR][/B](9+3) I would say the result is 288, but to be absolutely sure, it should be written as (48÷2)(9+3). If 48÷2(9+3) = 288, then (8a^2)÷4a = (8a^2)÷4(a) = (8a^2)÷4×a = 2a^3.

  53. Awesome
    Date: Tue, Apr 12 2011 22:42:37

    yeah, but in this case it is written on a single line and picking the unseen option is cooler ;D

  54. Riley
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 00:27:37

    TheAafg wrote: asians don't require a calculator, and whites can't do shit without a calculator.
    [video=youtube;dtotrboSUqQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtotrboSUqQ&feature=player_embedded[/video]

  55. TheAafg
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 00:52:18

    @Riley yay! lets take one person and judge the rest of the whites. Woohoo! -___- asians are smarter than whites at math specially, can't argue with that, now can you?

  56. Riley
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 02:00:49

    TheAafg wrote: @Riley yay! lets take one person and judge the rest of the whites. Woohoo! -___- asians are smarter than whites at math specially, can't argue with that, now can you?
    Just a stereotype that isn't always true. A lot of my non-asian friends are smarter than me at math.

  57. AwonW
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 02:18:16

    TheAafg wrote: @Riley yay! lets take one person and judge the rest of the whites. Woohoo! -___- asians are smarter than whites at math specially, can't argue with that, now can you?
    I suppose that explains why nearly all of the great mathematicians I've ever heard of are white huh.

  58. nateiskewl
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 02:25:31

    TheAafg wrote: @Riley yay! lets take one person and judge the rest of the whites. Woohoo! -___- asians are smarter than whites at math specially, can't argue with that, now can you?
    You're a racist. That's really all there is to it.

  59. TheAafg
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 02:33:44

    are you guys seriously arguing that white people are smarter than asians? its a stereotype yes, I know but the majority of asians are smarter than whites.

  60. nateiskewl
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:07:51

    TheAafg wrote: are you guys seriously arguing that white people are smarter than asians? its a stereotype yes, I know but the majority of asians are smarter than whites.
    Do tell how you figure a correlation exists between race and intelligence.

  61. TheAafg
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:26:10

    nateiskewl wrote: Do tell how you figure a correlation exists between race and intelligence.
    There are some extremely smart white people, wait correction were. Look around you bro, you ever see a white kid excelling in class? yea you do but in very low numbers. Now look at asians, do you see asians excelling in class? yes you do, in very high numbers. Do you even go to school or what?

  62. nateiskewl
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:31:56

    TheAafg wrote: There are some extremely smart white people, wait correction were. Look around you bro, you ever see a white kid excelling in class? yea you do but in very low numbers. Now look at asians, do you see asians excelling in class? yes you do, in very high numbers. Do you even go to school or what?
    You haven't given any evidence to suggest that Asians are smarter. Consider searching for a peer-reviewed study. On a personal note, all the smart people I've ever known have been either Indian or white. From my experience, Asians do get good grades in general, but they lack the critical thinking that the truly smart people have.

  63. Rapid
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:38:55

    imo it should be 2. maybe im just dumb but: my TEACHER said we need to eliminate first the parentheseseses sooooo: 48/2(9+3) ---> 48/2(12) but 12 still hass a parenthesis to eliminate that, we need to multiply the 12 to 2 48/2(12) ----> 48/24 48/24 = 2! well thats just me....

  64. TheAafg
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:43:45

    By Asians , I meant all Asians, yes that includes Indians. Me being Indian, was personally supporting Indian smartness ; D (secret motive)

  65. WhatsOfTheUp1
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:44:10

    EDIT: Oh crap forget this post. After searching around some more about this, I'm confused now >.<

  66. Rapid
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 03:51:14

    @WhatsOfTheUp1 yes 2*12 and 2(12) is the same. But written in a different way. (Told you im dumb)

  67. blahblahting
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 04:21:51

    nateiskewl wrote: Asians do get good grades in general, but they lack the critical thinking that the truly smart people have.
    I see this a lot. Many Asians study/learn material solely for quizzes/tests/grades, while not understanding the principles/logic behind things. I feel that I have solid critical thinking myself and that there ARE quite a few great Asian thinkers, but your point is definitely valid.

  68. hoiboy
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 04:31:59

    Hard working is not the same as smart. And not all asians are hard working. Look at me.

  69. AwonW
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 04:33:16

    hoiboy wrote: Hard working is not the same as smart. And not all asians are hard working. Look at me.
    Not all Asians are smart either. :ssst:

  70. boshi
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 05:32:38

    AwonW wrote: Not all Asians are smart either. :ssst:
    exactly. look at me.

  71. Erirornal Kraione
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 11:55:32

    I see no Asians studying maths at my university.

  72. chris
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 11:59:07

    me and my classmates are legit asians (we live in Asia), and most of us have problems with maths.

  73. Krypton
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 12:42:28

    48/ 2(9+3) =48/ 2(12) =48/24 =2. Nothing wrong with notation :/

  74. pensp
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 12:57:32

    hi everyone This question has appeared in many forums these few days, I don't really know who started this, but I see this question as a mean to troll, to create ''chaos'' in the forum. Well, I'd say the answer is 2. Personally I've debated in one of those forums and really there is not really an absolute answer to this because different people think differently. So I'm here to ask all of you a question. 1÷2x gives you? and 1/2x gives you? I shall break it down further. 1/2x is an ambiguous expression as it denotes two different meaning to people. It can mean 1/(2x), you can also see it as (1/2)x. For me I normally see it as 1/(2x). In words, we say, ''half of x''. Do note that / and ÷ denotes different meaning and / is used for fractions basically. So if you were to meant 48/2(9+3), I'm sure the ambiguility would be much greater.

  75. yeoh
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 13:09:07

    I think the answer is 2 because let's say 48÷2(9+3) is 48 ÷2(a+b) therefore it is 48÷2a+2b and if the a is 9 and b is 3, the answer would be 2 and ÷ is the same as / so 48/2(9+3) which is 48 2(9+3) and 48/24 is still two

  76. chogoling
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 14:12:52

    yeoh wrote: I think the answer is 2 because let's say 48÷2(9+3) is 48 ÷2(a+b) therefore it is 48÷2a+2b and if the a is 9 and b is 3, the answer would be 2 and ÷ is the same as / so 48/2(9+3) which is 48 2(9+3) and 48/24 is still two
    nope, to simplify things I'll let (a+b) =c 48÷2*c =24*c =24*(a+b) when a = 9, b =3 =24*(9+3) =24*12 =288

  77. Quai
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 14:15:26

    Its 288. Just add 9 and 3 = 12. Then divide 48 and 2 = 24. Then multiply 24 and 12 therefore the answer is 288. :)

  78. eazi-penspinner
    Date: Wed, Apr 13 2011 14:45:08

    have you ever heard of BED MASS? 2 is the answer ...................................... EDIT : sorry, the confusion is only because of the way you type it. it can be both 288 or 2

  79. nateiskewl
    Date: Thu, Apr 14 2011 01:50:34

    The answer should be 288, but I could see how some people could see an ambiguity with the two different division symbols. That's why nobody ever uses them. (Except for calculators, fuck calculators.)

  80. Awesome
    Date: Thu, Apr 14 2011 02:18:11

    TheAafg wrote: There are some extremely smart white people, wait correction were. Look around you bro, you ever see a white kid excelling in class? yea you do but in very low numbers. Now look at asians, do you see asians excelling in class? yes you do, in very high numbers. Do you even go to school or what?
    hahaha you think grades are related with intelligence. I mean sure intelligence helps, but lots of intelligent people realize its bullshit to take it so seriously.