UPSB v4
Spammer's Bin / Number Riddle
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 03:35:08
I was stumped at this riddle Create an equation with 2,3,4,5, "+" sign, a "=" sign no repeats dont cheat
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:08:52
2+5=3+4 really?
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:11:05
Awesome wrote: 2+5=3+4 really?
You repeated the + sign, I don't think that's allowed. -
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:13:23
Then it's impossible.
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:20:31
hoiboy wrote: Then it's impossible.
Then I guess the real riddle here is how anyone could be stumped by this. -
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:22:41
234+5=239? Lol. EDIT: Oh wait, that's still a repeat of 2 and 3. 23+45 = 68?
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:28:47
/fuck this wasted my time.
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:29:49
@TheAafg Try reading the thread
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:33:41
2+3 = 5 it doesn't say that we have to use all the numbers
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:45:50
TheAafg wrote: 2+3 = 5 it doesn't say that we have to use all the numbers
u have to use all equation/numbers -
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:49:29
3^4=52+???
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:55:11
This is one of those clever ones where you have to think outside the box and use two numbers to make a different one or something.
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:57:42
I think Riley got it. His equation is the only one that follows the conditions.
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 04:59:00
Riley wrote: 234+5=239? Lol. EDIT: Oh wait, that's still a repeat of 2 and 3. 23+45 = 68?
u used other numbers -
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 05:45:58
Actually Hippo's guess looks promising. EDIT: As long as you superscript the 4 so you're not "cheating"
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 05:47:35
3^2=5+4 If this is right, credit goes to Hippo
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 06:34:37
Dudak wrote: 3^2=5+4 If this is right, credit goes to Hippo
correct -
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 22:00:10
2+5-4=3 it doesnt say we CANT use another function so this could also work?
-
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 22:16:52
Wonder wrote: 2+5-4=3 it doesnt say we CANT use another function so this could also work?
seeing as you can use ^, i dont see why not -
Date: Tue, Mar 8 2011 23:14:36
if you were to write out the equation, the superscript symbol wouldn't be there but no matter how you write that equation the minus sign would still be there.
-
Date: Wed, Mar 9 2011 00:34:00
Hippo2626 wrote: if you were to right out the equation, the superscript symbol wouldn't be there but no matter how you write that equation the minus sign would still be there.
stop splitting hairs