UPSB v4

Research Department / Why is RD not just public?

  1. Mats
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 04:07:00

    It would make RD more active and there is no reason for this to be separate.

  2. Zombo
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 06:48:59

    :dunno: It's because the work is still under progress, we don't want to confuse people with things that are not official yet (especially important for naming committee and pen spinning relations)

  3. Mats
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 07:03:25

    Then keep those sections private, but not the others?

  4. RPD
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 13:40:05

    @Mats do you mean public reading, public posting or both?

  5. Mats
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 14:30:53

    RPD wrote: @Mats do you mean public reading, public posting or both?
    Both.

  6. RPD
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 14:45:20

    I dont think thats a really good idea. What we can do to get involved Non-RD people, is asking what they think about some topics, but that topics should be previously worked and discussed at RD. For example, the armaround-punkan name duality.

  7. Mats
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 14:48:30

    RPD wrote: I dont think thats a really good idea. What we can do to get involved Non-RD people, is asking what they think about some topics, but that topics should be previously worked and discussed at RD. For example, the armaround-punkan name duality.
    Why? :hmm:

  8. shoeman6
    Date: Sun, Feb 17 2013 15:15:04

    There is already enough mis-information,I agree that public input is essential. Maybe is RD was available upon request?

  9. Zombo
    Date: Mon, Feb 18 2013 20:44:23

    Mats wrote: Then keep those sections private, but not the others?
    im only giving examples, there might be some projects in other section that require to be secret before public release.